Community Task Force for Public Education
Community Survey Results
Executive Summary

The Community Task Force for Public Education was initiated in April 2007 for the purpose of researching the best educational initiatives around the United States and to make recommendations to the Jackson Madison County School Board that will make our schools an excellent, world class district.

In December 2007, the Community Task Force for Public Education conducted a survey of the residents of Jackson and Madison County to measure their perceptions on a variety of issues such as safety, discipline, leadership, grade span, and others. Approximately 5,000 residents of Jackson and Madison County were randomly selected to receive a survey. Over 500 households (540) completed the survey and returned it to the Jackson Madison County School System (JMCSS) central office, yielding an 11% response rate. This compares favorably with the response rates typically generated by marketing surveys of populations across the United States. Random selection of participants ensures that these survey results are reflective of results that would have been obtained if the entire population of Jackson and Madison County had been invited to participate in this survey.

Demographics
Survey respondents were primarily from 2 parent households (69%), while 11% identified themselves as 1 parent households (female). Of all respondents, 180 were parents of JMCSS students (33%). Approximately 18% of the respondents identified themselves as African American, which is a disproportionately lower percentage when compared to the overall population of African American residents in Jackson and Madison County (34%). Over three quarters of the survey respondents were White 77%, which is a disproportionately higher percentage when compared to the 2006 Census data (64%) for the county. Of those participants who responded to the parental involvement items (N=180), approximately 50% discussed their child’s academic achievement with their child’s teacher one to three times in the last year and approximately 70% of the respondents (where applicable) volunteered at their child’s school between one and four times during the past year.

The survey included four sections for participant ratings; satisfaction, importance items, general topic items, and demographics. The satisfaction items used a response scale of 1 (Not Satisfied) to 5(Very Satisfied) while the importance items used a response scale of 1 (Not Important) to 5 (Very Important).

Satisfaction and Importance Items
To provide an overall summary of the responses in the first two sections, the highest and lowest rated items for both sections are provided below.

Highest Satisfaction Items
1. The welcome you receive from staff members when you visit schools (Avg. = 3.6)
2. The quality of our after-school competitive athletic programs (Avg. = 3.4)
3. The diversity of teachers in our schools (Avg. = 3.3)
4. The diversity of administrators in our schools (Avg. = 3.3)
5. The leadership of our superintendent (Avg. = 3.3)

Lowest Satisfaction Items
1. The level of safety on our buses (Avg. = 2.0)
2. The discipline in our schools (Avg. = 2.0)
3. The level of our students’ academic achievement (Avg. = 2.3)
4. The leadership of our school board (Avg. = 2.3)
5. The graduation rates of our students (Avg. = 2.4)

Highest Importance Items
1. Improved discipline in our schools (Avg. = 4.7)
2. Increased safety on our buses (Avg. = 4.7)
3. Improved academic achievement of students (Avg. = 4.7)
4. Higher graduation rates of students (Avg. = 4.7)
5. Better quality leadership from the school board (Avg. = 4.7)

Lower Importance Items
1. A more diverse learning environment that includes all races of teachers (Avg.=3.7)
2. A more diverse learning environment that includes all races of administrators (Avg.=3.7)
3. Better quality after-school and/or before-school recreational programs (Avg.=3.5)
4. Better quality after-school competitive athletic programs (Avg.=3.5)
5. Better quality programs for students whose primary language is not English (Avg.=3.2)

From these results, it is clear that the residents of Jackson and Madison County are the least satisfied with safety and discipline in our schools, academic achievement and graduation rates, and the leadership of the school board. They also rated these same topics as being the most important.

In interpreting these results, it is important to note that this survey focused on the overall school district rather than on individual schools. Research in other states indicates that perceptions tend to differ between schools overall compared with a specific school. For example, respondents may believe that issues exist in other schools overall, but not in the school “my child attends.” Given that the current survey was focused on public perception of schools overall, it is expected that surveys targeting specific schools may yield a different pattern of results.

Additional Comparisons
Due to the demographics in Jackson and Madison County, a follow-up series of analyses were conducted to identify differences in perspectives between different segments of the population. Comparisons of responses between African American and White participants revealed that on the vast majority of the satisfaction and importance survey items, the responses of both groups were statistically identical. In the rare cases where there were significant differences, those differences tended to be in intensity rather than in direction. For example, African American participants might have strongly agreed with a specific survey item while the White participants rated the same item someplace between agree and strongly agree. Most comparisons fell in this category, or hovered around a neutral rating. This indicates that our community was fairly united in their satisfaction and importance ratings of our schools.

Comparisons with Tennessee and the United States
While public perception is influenced by a number of factors, it is important to compare public perception with the realities provided by empirical data as reported in State report cards or Federal documents. For example, the Task Force Community Survey reveals that the public is not satisfied with current student achievement and graduation rates. It is a given that we all would like our students to achieve at higher levels and that every student would graduate. However, some historical and current comparisons can provide context and framing for these two issues.

Student achievement in Jackson Madison County Schools was higher than the average for Tennessee in 2007. In Algebra I (a Gateway course), 80.7% of our students scored proficient or advanced, which is higher than the state average of 76.7%. In Biology I, another Gateway course, 95% of our students scored proficient or advanced, compared to 94.5% for the state. Finally, in English II, 94.6% of our students scored proficient or advanced, compared to 93.3% for the state. While we would all like for our students to score even higher than they are currently scoring, the fact that a greater percentage of our students scored proficient or advanced than did the state overall on all three Gateway tests, is evidence that we should be proud of our students and our system.

Graduation rates are another item with which the public is not satisfied. In the past, graduation rates for JMCSS students have lagged behind those of the state. For example, in 2005, our graduation rate was 71.4% compared to 77.9% for the state. In 2006, we still lagged behind the state (76.4% versus 80.7%). However, our students, teachers, and administrators have worked even harder since then. On the 2007 JMCSS report card, the graduation rate for JMCSS was 81.8%, which is identical to that of the state (81.8%). Jackson Madison County Schools students have caught up with the state levels of graduation.

Just as a historical perspective (for those of us who long for the “good old days”), graduation rates for the United States in 1880 was approximately 2%. In the 1940’s the graduation rate was slightly over 50%, and with the advent of No Child Left Behind, the 2014 goal is for 100% of all students in the nation to graduate from High School. JMCSS is moving forward with meeting this goal and has now caught up to the state average.

Survey Section Three Items
Communication and Involvement
Communication between schools, parents, and the public is an important issue, and the majority of survey respondents agreed with its importance. However, approximately 40% of the respondents were not satisfied with the topic of communication. Additionally, only 6% of the respondents agreed that Jackson Madison County Schools is doing a good job sharing information with the public. Regarding involvement, only 20% of the respondents were satisfied with the level of parental and community involvement in the schools. The vast majority (82%) agreed that more parental and community involvement in the schools was important.

Grade configuration
Currently, Jackson Madison County Schools has intermediate schools (grades 5 and 6). When asked what grade arrangement provides the best outcomes for students, 75% identified an option that did not include an intermediate school. This approach eliminates one of the current four school levels.

Funding
One of the final questions on the survey was related to funding. When asked if they would support an increase in funding for Jackson-Madison County Schools to provide a quality maintenance program, renovations, and/or new construction of schools, 65% of the people who responded to this question agreed. When comments were made on this item, the comments tended to state “only if current money is well spent.”
Summary and Recommendations

This survey was randomly distributed to 5,000 residents of Jackson and Madison County, with an 11% response rate. The respondents were satisfied with the quality of our competitive athletic programs, the diversity of our teachers and administrators, the welcome received by school visitors, and the leadership of the superintendent. Lower levels of satisfaction related to discipline and safety, academic achievement, graduation rates, and the leadership of our school board. For comparison purposes, it should be noted that student achievement in Jackson Madison County Schools was higher than the average for the state of Tennessee in our Gateway tests on the 2007 Report Card and our graduation rates are now the same as the state average.

Residents also voiced their opinion that there should be better communication from the schools and there should be more parental and community involvement with the schools. These topics are important to the majority of residents. Residents also feel that one school transition (e.g. intermediate schools) should be eliminated. Finally, the majority of respondents agreed to an increase in funding, but some wrote caveats for this item (e.g. only if current money is well spent).

Recommendations for action based on these results are provided by the Task Force for Public Education. More details are available in the Task Force Survey full report and in the recommendations of the Task Force presented to the Jackson Madison County School Board in April 2008.